I must admit that I was always a bit jealous about the Mac's backup system 'time machine'. Recently I bought a small Linux based NAS (WD MyBook World) and so I wanted to explore if I could find a similar solution like the Mac has got. I found it in Time Drive:
First I found these three candidates, the usual suspects so to say:
First I found these three candidates, the usual suspects so to say:
They all looked not bad but after I browsed some reviews 'Back in Time' drew my attention. Playing around with it I learned that it cannot handle backups to a remote machine. There are of course workarounds (and one more) but I got nervous about the hard links used for unchanged files and it was pretty much obvious the hard links won't work via FTP. The workarounds used sshfs where hard links are no problem but I'd lose some throughput for sure.
For TimeVault there is no 64 bit package and it depended on python 2.5 while my ubuntu 10.04 is already on 2.6.... Meh. Flyback does look kind of unmaintained and also does not support remote machines as backup target.
Just by chance I came across Time Drive which uses duplicity instead of rsync. And I just found it because I looked for a GUI for duplicity. There is virtually no blog entry or review of linux backup software mentioning Time Drive - which is quite a shame. Duplicity supports a lot of remote options, even Amazon S3 and encryption. They say it's still beta but it has already quite a history, so I think it's mature enough. Well, the UI looks partly copied from Back in Time which I find quite legitemate with OSS. Most of the workflow reminds a lot on Back in Time. Unfortunately Time Drive got its last update in April 2010 - so it might be half dead but it also looks fully featured though. I made my first backup and time will tell if I will keep using it.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen